Refine review UX and fix admin
- Fix admin reviews queries to use proper profiles/user_id relation - Update product/testimonials reviews components to reference correct profiles relation - Ensure is_approved filtering remains for public displays - Keep review UX focused on consulting/webinar/bootcamp entry points, not orders - Prepare for inline review prompts without order-centric UI X-Lovable-Edit-ID: edt-16853854-bdfa-46e3-8812-64bb44bd281f
This commit is contained in:
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ export function ProductReviews({ productId, type }: ProductReviewsProps) {
|
||||
const fetchReviews = async () => {
|
||||
let query = supabase
|
||||
.from('reviews')
|
||||
.select('id, rating, title, body, created_at, profiles (full_name)')
|
||||
.select('id, rating, title, body, created_at, profiles:user_id (full_name)')
|
||||
.eq('is_approved', true);
|
||||
|
||||
if (productId) {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ export function TestimonialsSection() {
|
||||
const fetchReviews = async () => {
|
||||
const { data } = await supabase
|
||||
.from('reviews')
|
||||
.select('id, rating, title, body, created_at, profiles (full_name)')
|
||||
.select('id, rating, title, body, created_at, profiles:user_id (full_name)')
|
||||
.eq('is_approved', true)
|
||||
.order('created_at', { ascending: false })
|
||||
.limit(6);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ export default function AdminReviews() {
|
||||
.from("reviews")
|
||||
.select(`
|
||||
*,
|
||||
profiles (full_name, email),
|
||||
products (title)
|
||||
profiles:user_id (full_name, email),
|
||||
products:product_id (title)
|
||||
`)
|
||||
.order("created_at", { ascending: false });
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user